← Back to Timeline

SCIENCE · EUROPE

Linnaeus Classifies Life

1735 AD

In 1735, the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus published the first edition of Systema Naturae, a slim work that set out a orderly scheme for classifying the natural world. It did not yet contain the two-part naming system for which he is best known, but it laid the groundwork for it. Over the following decades, Linnaeus's methods became the foundation of modern biological naming, and the system of genus and species names used by scientists today descends directly from his work.

Naturalists of the early eighteenth century faced a growing problem. European voyages to Asia, Africa and the Americas were bringing back large numbers of unfamiliar plants and animals, and there was no agreed way to name or organize them. Species were often identified by long Latin descriptive phrases that varied from author to author, making it hard to be sure that two scholars were discussing the same organism. Linnaeus, born in 1707 in southern Sweden, trained in medicine and botany at Lund and Uppsala, and he spent time in the Netherlands, where Systema Naturae was first printed while he worked toward his medical degree.

The first edition was only a few large pages, presenting the three kingdoms of animals, plants and minerals in a hierarchical arrangement of classes, orders, genera and species. His plant classification relied heavily on the number and arrangement of flowers' reproductive parts, a practical but artificial approach that some contemporaries found controversial, in part because of its frank sexual imagery. The book was revised and expanded many times, growing to several volumes by its twelfth edition in the 1760s.

The consistent use of binomial nomenclature came later. In his 1753 work Species Plantarum, Linnaeus applied a short two-word name, such as Homo sapiens, to each plant species, and the tenth edition of Systema Naturae in 1758 did the same for animals. Modern botanical and zoological naming conventions take these two works as their starting points. The brevity and regularity of the names made them easy to remember and share, and scientists across Europe and beyond adopted them.

Linnaeus's legacy is mixed. His framework made scientific communication far more precise, and the nested ranks he popularized remain central to taxonomy. Yet his scheme was not based on evolutionary relationships, and later biologists, especially after Darwin, reshaped classification to reflect common descent. His grouping of human beings into varieties has also drawn serious criticism for reinforcing racial stereotypes. Even so, the basic habit of giving every living thing a standard two-part Latin name remains a shared language of the life sciences.

Further reading

Recommended reading on the Early Modern:

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world

Related science events

Explore the full timeline · On This Day · About · Privacy Policy · Contact